Propose a fault form

You met a fault on a corpus that a graph would get wrong. Tell us what it is and show us the proof. A second reader reviews it, you get an answer by e-mail, and your name stays in the form's history.

1 The fault

Give it a short name

In English, like a title. The reviewer may rename it.

What does it do to a graph?

Mergetwo real things become one nodeSplitone thing becomes several nodesSpurious edgea relation the source never assertedMissinga node or relation the source asserts and the graph lacksWrong valuea property, number or date is wrongWrong labelan entity or relation type is wrongAnachronisma fact outside its validity interval, or a superseded status keptI don't knowthe reviewer will classify it

Why is it a fault?

2 The proof

Corpus

Name it so that someone else can open it: source, version or date.

Document identifier optional

When did you see it?

Closest existing form optional

If you found one in the list.

Verbatim excerpt

This is the proof. Without it, a proposal is a hypothesis, not an observation.

3 You

Name and affiliation optional

E-mail

Only to answer you. Not published.

The excerpt comes from a public corpus, not from a client document, and contains no personal data. I understand that a second reader reviews, that a contested form stays recorded as contested, and that my name stays in the form's history.

or open an issue on GitHub